Federal Activities
Executive Actions
Budget Actions
Nonprofit Nonpartisanship
Latest News
On May 29, 2026, the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) proposed sweeping changes to the Uniform Guidance, the set of rules governing federal grants, cooperative agreements, and other monetary awards to nonprofits, state and local governments, and other grantees. If implemented, the proposal would give any administration unprecedented authority to withhold, suspend, or terminate grants, alter award terms mid-performance, and make funding decisions based on partisan ideology rather than community need or congressional intent, all with reduced public transparency.
Executive Actions
Since taking office, President Trump has signed many Executive Orders (EOs) with wide-ranging consequences for nonprofits and the communities they serve. These actions have targeted DEI programs, government grants and contracts, civic engagement, immigration, LGBTQ+ rights, and environmental protection, with measures ranging from political scrutiny of federal grantmaking to increased enforcement actions against organizations serving immigrant communities. While many of these EOs have been challenged in court, litigation remains ongoing. Taken together, these actions reflect a sustained effort to restrict nonprofit independence, reduce public investment in civil society, and limit the sector’s ability to serve and advocate for the communities that depend on it.
Oppose Sweeping Proposed Changes to Federal Grantmaking
On May 29, 2026, the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) proposed sweeping changes to the Uniform Guidance, the set of rules governing federal grants, cooperative agreements, and other monetary awards to nonprofits, state and local governments, and other grantees.
If implemented, the proposal would give any administration unprecedented authority to withhold, suspend, or terminate grants, alter award terms mid-performance, and make funding decisions based on partisan ideology rather than community need or congressional intent, all with reduced public transparency. For nonprofits, this means unpredictable financial, legal, and reputational risk that could make accepting federal awards untenable. This could lead to disruptions to essential services, including housing, community development, health, education, food, shelter, community services, disaster recovery, and more in communities and states nationwide. Programs addressing racial and social disparities or serving historically underinvested communities are particularly at risk.
Take Action
Sign onto a national letter opposing the proposed changes, contact your congressional delegation, and submit your own public comment by July 13, 2026.
Resources
Budget Actions
Since taking office, the Trump administration has enacted significant budget cuts that are deeply impacting charitable nonprofits and the communities they serve. These cuts have been carried out through multiple channels, including the H.R. 1 budget reconciliation bill, as well as ongoing rescission efforts seeking to roll back previously approved funding. Learn more below.
What NAO's monitoring
On July 4, 2025, the Congress passed H.R. 1, President Trump’s 2025 budget reconciliation bill, also known as the Big, Beautiful Bill Act. The final version of the bill contains sweeping changes, with most provisions expected to negatively impact the nonprofit sector. Key provisions include:
OPPOSE:
- Largest Medicaid Cuts in History — $1 trillion in cuts nationwide over 10 years, causing 11.8 million people nationwide to lose their health insurance. Adds work requirements, limits the use of the state provider taxes, changes administrative and application procedures, and requires the reverification of eligibility every 6 months.
- An estimated 450,000-600,000 Oregonians will be impacted by new administrative requirements. Possibly 200,000 families and children will lose coverage.
- SNAP Cuts — $287 billion in cuts nationwide over 10 years, causing 3 million Americans to lose benefits, by expanding work requirements to 20 hours/week for able bodied adults by raising age limit from 55 years old to 64 years old. Increases state share of the cost to administer the program from 50% to 70%. States with high error rates would pay for part of the food costs, up to 15%.
- Oregon’s administrative error rate is 14.06%. The state would need to reduce the error rate below 6%, or they would have to pay 75% of administrative costs for running SNAP in the state, about $500 million every two years.
- 1% Floor for Charitable Contributions by Corporations— Estimated to eliminate $4.2–$4.8 billion in annual charitable giving.
- 0.5% Floor on Charitable Giving for Itemizers — Further weakens incentives for and amount of charitable giving.
- 1.4% tax to colleges and universities with a “student adjusted endowment” between $500,000-$750,000. – Decreases the financial resources available to nonprofits to advance their mission.
SUPPORT:
- Expanded non-itemizer charitable income tax deduction — further incentivizes charitable giving among the 90% of taxpayers who do not itemize their tax deductions.
The bill’s projected $3.4 trillion deficit over the 2025–2034 period falls far short of addressing the nonprofit sector’s expanding role in filling gaps left by government and the private sector. In Oregon alone, H.R. 1 is projected to cut $15 billion in federal funding from Oregon for Medicaid, food benefits and other programs over the next 10 years. The state will be unable to absorb these substantial reductions in the coming years, making it unavoidable that many Oregonians will be negatively impacted by these federal actions.
Refer to the Resources below to see a more in-depth breakdown of the provisions of the bill. Visit NAO’s State Activities page to learn more about the estimated state-level impacts of H.R. 1.
In 2025, the Trump administration began submitting multiple rescission packages to Congress, aiming to cancel billions of dollars in funds already approved by lawmakers. In July, both chambers narrowly passed H.R. 4, a $9 billion rescissions package that cut funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), world health programs, the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), and National Public Radio (NPR). The bill was signed into law just days before the July 18 deadline under the Impoundment Control Act, after which Congress would have been required to spend the authorized funds.
NAO, together with our partner associations across the United States and the National Council of Nonprofits are keeping a close eye on whether Congress will attempt to enact a second tax reconciliation bill this term. Such a reconciliation package, would allow Congress to approve specific tax and spending measures with only a simple majority in the Senate, rather than the 60 votes typically needed.
While most experts felt it was unlikely that Congress would take up another reconciliation package (the process is very cumbersome and the Republicans have only a razor-thin majority in the House), the war in Iran and the need for supplemental military funding are increasing the chances that Congress might turn to allocate additional funds and take up this process. NAO will work to monitor any legislative package closely to ensure that harmful provisions impacting the nonprofit sector are not included, including those tax provisions that were initially proposed in earlier versions of H.R. 1, but that we were all collectively able to get removed from the final tax bill by talking with our Senators and Representatives. If Congress takes up a reconciliation bill, it is possible we’ll see renewed efforts to cut safety net programs, like Medicaid and SNAP, as these continue to be identified as areas of “waste, fraud, and abuse.”
Resources
- National Council of Nonprofits - Advocating for Federal Spending: A Practical Guide for Nonprofits
- Trust-Based Philanthropy Project - The Ripple Effect of Federal Actions
- National Council of Nonprofits - Analysis of the 2025 Tax Bill and Its Impact on Charitable Nonprofits
- Independent Sector - Tax Provisions in House-Passed and Senate-Passed Reconciliation Legislation Impacting the Charitable Sector
- National Council of Nonprofits - Advocating for Federal Spending: A Practical Guide for Nonprofits
Nonprofit Nonpartisanship
The Johnson Amendment is an important provision in federal tax code Section 501(c)(3), that states that a charitable nonprofit may “not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.” Since it’s inception in 1954, this language has protected the integrity of charitable nonprofits, foundations, and religious organizations. In exchange for tax-exempt status, these entities agree not to participate in or intervene in any political campaign, ensuring that they focus on their missions and remain dedicated to the public good.
In recent years, there have been numerous efforts to repeal or weaken the Johnson Amendment. Most recently, the IRS has sought court approval of a settlement with the National Religious Broadcasters and two Texas churches that would effectively undermine the law. If approved, the settlement would declare the Johnson Amendment unconstitutional and bar its enforcement against the two churches involved. This would set a dangerous precedent that could open the door for broader dismantling of the provision.
Take Action
Nonprofit organizations are invited to sign onto a national letter calling on the Trump Administration to protect nonprofit nonpartisanship.
Members Get More
As a member of NAO, you become part of an important network of organizations, affiliates, and individuals who believe in the vitality of the sector.
Newsletter Sign Up
Our NAO Update arrives in your inbox regularly – it’s a one-stop shop for timely advocacy updates, upcoming events, nonprofit resources, funding opportunities, and more.